531 /Journals

JOURNAL 1

What its like in Mr Putnam's PE class:


During CP1, my students quickly realized that my PE class would be different from their other PE experiences.  This experience was likely refreshing to some and perhaps frustrating to a few.  Students who felt established in an old routine were at risk of being nonconformists in my set-up, but anyone willing to try something new and take on fun and engaging challenges was in for a good time.  Physical Education is all about students enjoying movement, and collaborating to achieve specific goals within the unit of instruction.  This means that students need to have strong communication and general affective skills.  Early in my CP1, I used Adventure Education activities to get students interacting and working together, even with classmates they didn’t know very well before.  Ideally, students would become accountable individuals who pursue their own learning in the areas of fitness, sport, and lifelong activity.  Those kinds of goals don’t come easily, because students must be motivated to engage beyond their initial comfort levels, and see how being active is actually more fun than they imagined.
 

Journal 2




Quote from the video
What it means
Deeper thinking
    “Creativity is becoming as important in education as literacy” (Robinson, TED video).
In the future that we cannot see, the practice of excluding arts and kinesthetic learning would put us at a disadvantage.
Outsourcing, technology and economics (Asia, Abundance and Automation) are making left-brained skills less of a priority. If the ability to produce original thoughts and actions is going to be as valuable as we are saying here, then creativity is going to have to be PART of how we define an educated person.
"(If Kids) don’t know...they’ll have a go… I don’t mean to say that being wrong is the same as being creative" (Robinson, TED video).
When kids honestly use what they do know, and approach a situation with their own ideas, they are likely to come up with something original.
Students are often taught to fear failure to the extreme that they stop trying to come up with new ideas.  There is a deeper layer to this issue, I believe!  Its my opinion that we are failing to teach kids in the affective domain, to the extent that they fear failing their peers more than they are afraid of failing their teachers.  Peers will often keep each other from being creative, when we should be teaching them to care, nurture, and push each other’s creative abilities.
“We start teaching them from the waist up, and then the head… and then slightly to the left.” (Robinson, TED video).
We must educate the whole individual, because when we put boundaries on our children it cripples their creative nature.
“Why don’t we teach dance as much as we teach math?”… “professors view the body as a way of getting their brains to meetings” (Robinson)
Thomas Jefferson said that health is more important than reading.  Creative outlets such as dance also incorporate the whole person, and make us complete individuals, versus left-brain miserable robots.  As a Physical Education advocate, this entire video could not have felt more aimed at educating the whole person versus education that overvalues left-brained heavy learning.
"All kids have talents, and we squander them, pretty ruthlessly." (Robinson, TED Video)
By forcing children to learn too many things in our own ideal fashion, we pull them away from their natural talents.
The example of the choreographer could not have summed it up better.  I cant help but wonder how many geniuses have been ruined in recent years in our education system.  Also, the notion of ADHD “not being an available condition” in the 1930’s is priceless!  Someone close to me was diagnosed with the same thing, and thankfully his parents made arrangements for him to learn at his own pace and learning style.  He is a gifted musician, song writer, and as a Junior in high school, is very involved in helping others in the community and overseas.
 





4 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Journal 3

    To what degree do you think you really understand the needs of your students and what they need for the 21st century? How wide is the “gap” between them and you? In what areas are the gaps? What can you do to make connections?

    I think that as teachers, each of us cannot know extensively what our kids need to help them do well in the future. I think that collaboratively, if we as colleagues can impart what our own values are in terms of skills and knowledge and what is unique to our academic disciplines then we are doing our best to prepare them. For example, I might value for my students to have many experiences and approach situations with the right attitude, putting their brains and efforts together to create a unique solution. I am valuing the affective domain, problem solving, being resourceful and creative. They must deal with the information and situation given to them within the curriculum. Another teacher might value other aspects of education, but together we contribute to meeting our student’s needs. Because we don’t know everything the future will hold, I think that there are tried and true aspects of being a well-rounded human being that can be considered.
    I feel like the gap between my students and myself in fairly narrow. My dad has been teaching high school for 35 years, and I can clearly see the difference (he keeps up pretty well!) The things that I know are valuable for me these days aren’t too different from the students that I will teach in the early years of my teaching career. That might not always be the case, however. If I teach for 30+ years, then some of my students will live in the 22nd century!
    I function in society as a pretty up to speed individual with knowledge that allows me to network and be productive across the landscape. I am able to get at information and use learning tools in ways that I can help my students and also am able to connect with their daily experiences. I understand what is going on with them, socially and academically.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Reflective Journal

    This semester has been a whirlwind of experiences. The fact that I use the notion of experiences rather than another descriptor is definitely pointed towards the idea that I have learned a great deal about how the world of education works, and responsively how I mean to insert myself into that realm. Clinical Practice (student teaching for most), college coursework, and collaboration with my peers in the credential program have all been meaningful to me, and mostly I would say that I have developed a system if you will, of evaluating what I value.
    Clinical Practice has been an experience of working with a group of dynamic and strong minded individuals who are very successful PE teachers and coaches, who head up a strong program. I have learned to value things that were described previously as lower value or even negative. I have made decisions about how I would develop my own learning environment. I have held true to the concept of Physical Education as a LEARN FIRST environment, and I can imagine my own class. My class would incorporate technology in ways that only the most savvy PE teachers (mostly in the UK) are currently teaching. Video analysis, and group projects to create meaningful products that educate the community about health and wellness would be a part of my classroom. In class with other candidates, we described an Integrated Thematic Unit that fulfills this in ways, and you can find that on this blog.
    Weight training was a new teaching experience for me. “Motivation” is a featured element of these classes, traditionally. I see this as not only a place to shape character, but an environment where concepts, facts and practical content for individuals can be developed to help make them strong, educated citizens who value fitness and wellness. Exercise science, I believe, is the future of this type of class, in the sense that an academic nature could be brought out more fully and include content that approaches physiology with practical lab applications in the weight room.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Philosophy/ Model Integration

    My philosophy of learning has personally been experimentalism for some time. I feel this way about my learning environment because I think that students take more ownership and meaning to things that they can examine themselves and create a unique version of based on their collaboration and personal connection with the content. This leaves room for teaching students HOW to study, HOW to collaborate and HOW to take responsibility for themselves and their community. A physical education class where students examine common stumbling blocks for obesity, fitness and physical activity and can create their own service to the community would be really unique! That is the type of PE class I envision.
    I have considered how many models fit with physical education, and I will now explain another: inductive thinking. This model is based largely on classifying, and in PE there are many types of potential information that get lumped together if you will, and should be understood by the physically educated person. For example, cardiovascular, pulmonary, and respiratory systems in the body are essential to understand for the physically educated person. Being able to group these systems and name cooperating features to develop the bigger concept of cardiovascular help would be very beneficial for the individual. Understanding what those parts are is a building block for the next steps within my philosophy, such as a project for creating a documentary about cardio exercises, heart rate monitors and interviewing people in the community about the types of physical activities they enjoy and benefit from.

    ReplyDelete

Head for the great outdoors!

Head for the great outdoors!